Simply DT - Direct Thermal Labels

Introducing Simply DT™ No Added Bisphenols,

Mactac's new sub-brand of the Simply Sustainable® portfolio of products. These direct thermal materials are manufactured with no added bisphenols in the direct thermal chemistry. Part numbers will not change.

Simply DT Logistics Grade

DLTL2602

DLTL2602-P10

DLTL9502

Simply DT Prescription Labelstock

DDRX9502

DDRX9502-P10

 

Simply DT Direct Thermal

DTNN1702NB

DTNN1702NB-P10

DTNN1752NB-7

DTNN1752NB-7P10

DTNN2602NB

DTNN2602NB-P10

DTNN2652NB-7

DTNN2652NB-7P10

DTNN7802NB

DTNN7802NB-P10

 

DTNN7852NB

 

DTNN7852NB-7P10

* Required

Your message has been sent.

All of the new Simply DT, No Added Bisphenol facestocks will comply with Washington State Legislation banning bisphenols in thermal paper and will not require warning labels as outlined by Prop 65.

Contact Mactac Regulatory for more information. 


What is Prop 65:

“Right to know” Regulation California: nothing is banned, but must be communicated Meaning: Final customer should see a warning on package Prop 65 does not require quantity (concentration) to be declared

BPS (Bisphenol S): added in December 2023

Female Reproductive Toxicity

After the chemical is added to the list: 1 year to comply

For more information: Proposition 65 - OEHHA (ca.gov)


Washington State

What is it:  It is a domestic regulation  Target — Drink can, food cans and thermal paper.

When: January 1, 2026
What to expect: Restriction

  • Banning: From January 1st, 2026
  • No person may manufacture, sell, or distribute Thermal Paper products that contains intentionally added bisphenols.
  • This does not apply to consumer product manufactured before January 1, 2026.
  • Regulation definition of intentionally added: above 200 ppm (0.02%).
  • Manufacturers may rebut this presumption by submitting a statement to ecology that includes the following information.

- The name and address of the person submitting the statement.
- A statement that a bisphenol was not intentionally added. Provide credible evidence supporting that statement and include information, data, or sources relevant to demonstrate that a bisphenol was not intentionally added.

Reporting: If at any point federal action preempts the ability to implement the restrictions
More information: WAC 173-337 - Washington State Department of Ecology